Showing posts with label Harvard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harvard. Show all posts

Sunday, May 25, 2025

2025.05.25 DID YOU KNOW? Lyn G. Brakeman, Spiritual Lemons, blog post

 

Did you know there are no fences in the fields of Divinity? There are no boundaries, only Presence. AND always a story. 

When I lived in Cambridge, a terrific small city under the wing of a big city called Boston, I used to walk downtown often passing by Harvard Yard, its huge iron gates open. Occasionally I’d wander about inside the Yard, absorbing the air of the Academy. Harvard, however, wasn’t academic or elite, just unlocked.

I learned all this from a street beggar named James. He sat in his wheel chair. He always smiled and muttered something unintelligible, as his trembling hands searched for his cup. At first I felt afraid of James. I passed him by. One day I stopped. I don’t know why, but James beckoned. I gave him a smile and a coin or two. He grinned. I walked on. All of this against the backdrop of the stately Harvard.


One day James motioned me closer and managed to tell me a story in his halting way. He told me that his wheelchair was stolen out from under him by some “hoodlums”.  He teared up. I braced myself. But then he pointed at the great gates of Harvard Yard and said “They saved me.” 


Some Harvard fraternity students had pooled their money and bought James a brand new wheel chair designed for someone with his palsied and mentally challenged condition. James could manage his new chair easily, and it did give his life work—begging—meaning. He lived in a special care home, and begging was his own chosen way of contributing. 


James and Harvard students also healed my habit of making judgmental assumptions about beggary without knowledge of the inside story and the truth. I gave James my last $20 and walked the rest of my way home, begging Divinity to inspire generosity and peace for healing the world over.  


Sunday, December 12, 2021

2021.12.12 The Arts in Advent. What Poems Can Do.

Poetry is one of the most subtle, supple, and sacred arts. Here is the story of one poet whose soul spoke wonders in poems.  


Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, American educator and poet, was born in 1807, the second of eight children, in Portland, Maine, which was then a part of Massachusetts. He was studious and became fluent in Latin, publishing his first poem in the Portland Gazette in 1820, at age thirteen. Henry entered Bowdoin College and graduated Phi Beta Kappa at 15.


As a senior, Longfellow wrote to his father about his own aspiration in literature:  “I will not disguise it in the least…. the fact is, I most eagerly aspire after future eminence in literature, my whole soul burns most ardently after it, and every earthly thought centres in it…. I am almost confident in believing, that if I can ever rise in the world it must be by the exercise of my talents in the wide field of literature.” 


*  *  *  *


I can identify with such determination and passionate confidence. Growing up, I discovered who I was through diaries and journals. Still, as an adult woman I was not as fee as Longfellow. I wanted a family, plus a bit of writerly status. I became a thief of time, fitting writing into the rest of my life, personal and professional as an Episcopal priest.  


*  *  *  *


In 1829, Longfellow turned down a professorship at Bowdoin College. Imagine! He wrote to the president of Bowdoin that he was turning down the professorship because he considered the $600 salary "disproportionate to the duties required". The trustees raised his salary to $800 with an additional $100 to serve as the college’s Librarian. All of this was to him a “joyless work.” So guess what?—he married a childhood friend, Mary Storer Potter, and they settled into marital unhappiness.    


By 1834, he was contacted by the president of Harvard to be contracted as professor of modern languages but stipulated he had to study abroad first. There he studied German, Finnish, Swedish, Danish and Icelandic. In October of 1835, Mary miscarried at six months and died. Longfellow sent Mary’s body to be buried in Mt Auburn Cemetery in Cmbridge and fell into a deep sadness. “All day I am weary and sad.” 


Returning to Harvard in 1836, this young brooding man of thirty, lived in Cambridge at Craigie House where he rented rooms and began to publish poetry. Longfellow was well liked as a professor, though he disliked being "constantly a playmate for boys" rather than "stretching out and grappling with men's minds.” The malice of discontent took residence in his grieving midlife soul. 


*  *  *  *


I recall a similar midlife feeling when I was a young mother of four blooming children and married to a husband pursuing his own ambitions and not home enough to be a companion/partner in project life. I prayed and lamented. I experimented with extramarital flirtations. Unable to find each other, my first husband and I divorced in 1982. I journaled my way through it all. 


*  *  *  * 


Longfellow married Frances (Fanny) Appleton in 1843 after a very long courtship in which he pursued her over seven years with vigor and passion. When she finally agreed he was so nervous he walked 90 minutes to her house on Beacon Hill in Boston and crossed the Boston Bridge which, as of 1906, was renamed the Longfellow Bridge. Perhaps the American version of the Florentine Bridge of Sighs. 


The couple had six children. Tragedy struck in 1861. Fanny was putting locks of her children's hair into an envelope and attempting to seal it with hot sealing wax while Longfellow took a nap. Her dress suddenly caught fire, though it is unclear exactly how; burning wax or a lighted candle may have fallen onto it. Longfellow was awakened from his nap and rushed to help her, throwing a small rug over her, and trying to stifle the flames with his body. Fanny was taken to her room to recover and a doctor was called. She was in and out of consciousness throughout the night and was administered ether. She died shortly after 10:00 the next morning, July 10, after requesting a cup of coffee. 


Longfellow, in trying to save her, had burned himself badly. He was unable to attend her funeral. His facial injuries led him to stop shaving, and he wore a beard from then on. That beard became his trademark. We all have scars to hide or disguise—most of them left by love.  




















Devastated by her death, Longfellow resorted to laudanum and ether to deal with his grief, begged not to be sent to an asylum, and noted he was “inwardly bleeding to death.”  Eighteen years later he wrote a sonnet: “The Cross of Snow”:  


Such is the cross I wear upon my breast

These eighteen years, through all the changing scenes

And seasons, changeless since the day she died. 


*  *  *  *


In the late 1970s into the 80s I too experienced such an overload of grief—a deluge in which I thought I would drown. My youngest sister died, my father died, my marriage died, my divorce was finalized, and my vocational aspirations in the Episcopal Church died. At the same time I suffered a bout of asthma so severe it resisted usual treatments. A pulmonologist administered medical treatment enough to help me breathe, but my lungs have never been the same. They carry the memory of all that grief. 


When you banish or bury pain you also banish love. Therapy helped me retrieve my lost feelings, including anger, and saved me from drowning, or trying to live a rich full life from the neck up only! Writing, theological studies, prayer retreats, liturgy, growing children, therapy, and trying out big sins also helped round me out. In time I found a new and vital lover whom I married, and a new diocesan bishop in time ordained me deacon in 1987 and priest in1988.  


  *  *  *  *


Longfellow's personality became part of his reputation, in part because he had been presented as a gentle, placid, poetic soul, an image perpetuated by his brother Samuel Longfellow who wrote an early biography which specifically emphasized these points. James Russell Lowell said, Longfellow had an "absolute sweetness, simplicity, and modesty.”  At his funeral Ralph Waldo Emerson called him “a sweet and beautiful soul.’ His real life, however, was more difficult than people assumed, or than he let on. He had neuralgia, chronic pain and poor eyesight, and much bereavement over the death of his wives and later a daughter. He was quiet, reserved, private, and more introverted. He found his energy and emotions through his poetry. In later years he became unsocial and avoided leaving home, dying at 75.  


When you banish pain you banish love.  


Longfellow remained popular with children, who adored him. He wrote a poem about the village blacksmith under the spreading chestnut tree. When that tree was cut down, the children of Cambridge, Massachusetts, had it converted into an armchair they presented to him. I still hold dear this phrase in his poem “The Children’s Hour.”  I begged my mother to read it nightly. It made me feel important. 


Between the dark and the daylight,

      When the night is beginning to lower,

Comes a pause in the day's occupations,

      That is known as the Children's Hour.


After Longfellow’s death, his bust was placed in Westminster Abbey in London, the only American so honored. He was also honored with a commemorative stamp issued by the US Postal Service.  All this, yet his popularity declined quickly after his death in 1882 as academics shifted their attention to other poets like Frost and Whitman. The twentieth century literary scholar Kermit Vanderbilt noted, "Increasingly rare is the scholar who braves ridicule to justify the art of Longfellow's popular rhymings.”


*  *  *  *

Such scholarly snobbery angers me. I tend to write it off as the jealousy of lesser, maybe would-be, poets and those who refuse to acknowledge the joy of children  who live their live in rhyme. Why do we all remember nursery rhymes so well?  I remember memorizing some of Longfellow’s work, as does my youngest son John, now fifty-one, who recently told me that when he struggled in school with learning problems, bullying, and later with colitis, he would every day read to himself before he went to bed Longfellow’s poem of 1844. I wept.


 “The Day Is Done”   


The day is done, and the darkness 

      Falls from the wings of Night, 

As a feather is wafted downward 

      From an eagle in his flight. 


I see the lights of the village 

      Gleam through the rain and the mist, 

And a feeling of sadness comes o'er me 

      That my soul cannot resist: 

A feeling of sadness and longing, 

      That is not akin to pain, 

And resembles sorrow only 

      As the mist resembles the rain. 


Come, read to me some poem, 

      Some simple and heartfelt lay, 

That shall soothe this restless feeling, 

      And banish the thoughts of day. 


For, like strains of martial music, 

      Their mighty thoughts suggest 

Life's endless toil and endeavor; 

      And tonight I long for rest. 


Read from some humbler poet, 

      Whose songs gushed from his heart, 

As showers from the clouds of summer, 

      Or tears from the eyelids start; 


Who, through long days of labor, 

      And nights devoid of ease, 

Still heard in his soul the music 

      Of wonderful melodies. 


Such songs have power to quiet 

      The restless pulse of care, 

And come like the benediction 

      That follows after prayer. 


Then read from the treasured volume 

      The poem of thy choice, 

And lend to the rhyme of the poet 

      The beauty of thy voice. 


And the night shall be filled with music, 

      And the cares, that infest the day, 

Shall fold their tents, like the Arabs, 

And as silently steal away.


Longfellow captured hearts and soothed souls, even if his poetry wasn’t gushing with subjectivity or bulging with the latest innovations. It was enough for me to cross over the Longfellow Bridge in Cambridge regularly. That bridge always meant we were nearing home.


As I age, I feel, with Longfellow, that “sadness of longing not akin to pain”—the deep sigh of homing. That’s what the gentle flow of a poem’s soul can do for my own soul.


*  *  *  *


There are reasons why gospel writers  remember Jesus’s affection and wonder at children—the chief exemplars and purveyors of the heavenly kingdom on earth as it is in heaven. 

Thursday, October 24, 2013

2013.10.23 Salman Rushdie: An "Exile" Speaks

The key note speaker at this year’s annual Boston Book Festival was Salman Rushdie. I hadn’t read a word he wrote but dimly remembered the controversy about his 1988 book The Satanic Verses: hot accusations of blasphemy and the bearded face of the fierce Islamic cleric, Ayatollah Khomeini, spiritual leader of Iran. 

Ignorant and secretly loving the idea of hearing someone who, like Jesus the Christ, had been accused of blasphemy and survived, I squeezed, with my husband, Dick, into a side pew in the huge and packed Old South Church in Boston.  

The “address” was a conversational interview with Homi Bhabha, professor of English and American Literature at, where else, Harvard. Bhaba spoke of Rushdie’s memoir, Joseph Anton which details the “afterlife” of Khomeini’s fatwa against Rushdie.

A fatwa, I looked this up, is an order of execution. Rushdie spent several years under police protection in the UK where he was a citizen and had lived for years.  “The police kept telling me it would be all right, over soon, but it lasted 12 years.” Rushdie remarked. He considers himself to be an “exile.” He felt locked out, though the furor was about his book.  

It is interesting to consider just how much separability there should be between an author and his/her writing? Not much I reckon, especially if the words, characters and driving rhythm of a book dethrone a religious hero. Some shrug it off, but extremists get violently defensive.

The British in time broke diplomatic relations with Iran and knighted Rushdie who now lives in NY City—mecca of publishing. He has in fact spent most of his life in the West but he writes about the East, his heartspace.

Most of us have felt like an exile from time to time: in a relatively safe comfort zone but with certain restrictions, which can be emotional as well as physical. At times I felt locked out of the "country" of my first family, and it has been so in my Church as well. The longing to belong can feel almost feral. Where? How? When? This is Rushdie's passion and his work. He's married to it—obviously since the man has had four wives. 



There is a lot more to this complex story. (Check online.) But what stood out for me was Rushdie’s adamance about not adopting the “security view” of the world, which he said was of necessity based on the worst case scenario, such as if you cross a street you might be hit by a car, so we tell you not to cross the street. That was of course an exaggerated example, but I wondered if I would cross against a red light if there were no cars around and it was 5 a.m.in the morning. Probably, I’d sit there till the light turned green. And I'm not Ms. obedient.

“You cannot buy the security vision of the world, because if you do you can’t have liberty. Don’t buy it!” He's not from New Hampshire, Live free or die, though he credited America for "giving me back my freedom." Salman Rushdie has enjoyed both safety and freedom and has not died for either.   I imagine he doesn't think much of Homeland Security. 

People push different envelopes. It depends on what rules and the stakes. I’d love, for example to eliminate all the masculine pronouns we keep on using for God, but I don’t want to be “exiled,” to say nothing of really hurting someone’s sensibilities.  It’s the old question about how to balance pastoral sensitivity and prophetic action for change you believe is necessary. What ditch will you die in?   If I’m going to “die” for a vital cause, I want someone with me in the ditch. 

 Rushdie advocates for religious reform and moving beyond traditionalism in religions.  "Broadmindedness is related to tolerance; open-mindedness is the sibling of peace." 
 I agree but Rushdie is a self-declared atheist and I am not.

A man in the packed-church audience identified himself as an atheist and asked for advice on how to co-exist as a non-believer amidst believers. Rushdie didn't really answer, but said, "Well, you can console yourself with the thought that you're right and they're wrong."

I thought his tone was tongue in cheek but I felt annoyed at the attitude. I mean, here we all were in a Christian church. Okay, I felt defensive, but I thought his tone sounded as arrogant as the attitudes of the traditionalists he preaches against. Probably a slip of ego. More importantly, I’m sick of all religion(s) getting lumped in with the excesses of extremists in any religion, including atheism, as if they all were the same.

Imagine the hubris of thinking I could defend God. But what else do you do when you're in love?