Showing posts with label church. Show all posts
Showing posts with label church. Show all posts

Sunday, December 8, 2024

2024.12.08 ADVENT—War AND Peace? Lyn G. Brakeman, Spiritual Lemons, blog post


I confess that I feel afraid of some of the recent, and perhaps inevitable, developments in this country.  Yes, it does seem to me that traditional logic—the more wars we make the more peace we will get—is painfully flawed. 


Here is Doris "Dorie" Miller,  a U.S. Navy sailor who was the first Black recipient of the Navy Cross and a nominee for the Medal of Honor. 



















As a mess attendant second class in the United States Navy, Miller helped carry wounded sailors to safety during the attack on Pearl Harbor. For his heroic behavior he died.  But did things really change?  And now there was a martyr to praise, our consciences relieved— until the next conflict arrises.

   

I remember a time in my own life when I felt all alone and helpless. The parish church offered quiet days for people to sit or kneel in silence to pray. I sat there for a while. Then I kneeled, stared up at the crucified Jesus, and cried. My tears startled me. I brushed them away, looking around to make sure no one saw me. I just sat there thinking Jesus must have been a total idiot to fall into this trap. What was he trying to prove? 


What are we proving today with all our wars? Do wars make heroes? Just so we can weep and worship one more martyr? Are we soothed by our tears? Well, yes— until the next conflict arises.  My tears turned out to be about fear and hard personal choices. 

*  *  *  * 

Is that what our country faces today, trapped in a twisted paradox: the more war we make the less trustworthy the peace that follows? I mean school kids are afraid to go to school. “What if a gun happens to me today?” Having a license to carry a gun is as common as having a drivers license. Violence is reported every single day on the News. The next slogan I expect to see is “GUNS FOR PEACE” !  


When in history has WAR solved territorial disputes or political disagreements?  WWI was known as the “war to end all wars.” Did it?  WWII did, you will say. NOPE! On and on! 


Wars don’t make peace. But I can—and so can you.  

Sunday, July 7, 2024

2024.07.07 Who DID Write the New Testament Anyway? Lyn G. Brakeman, blog post

When I read biblical readings about politics, the politics of St. Paul stand out! Paul  frantically wrote to fulfill his calling to spread the good news preached by Jesus of Nazareth, or Galilee, or Ephesus, or Corinth, or in your heart. Paul was a convert, not programmed to endear many, and admitting he was wrong—sometimes.   

I remember the omnipresent and ever-irritating examination question in the final exam for the course in New Testament at Yale Divinity School. Students knew it was coming. We had been well prepared. We knew our stuff, yet everyone quivered.


WAS there a “right” answer? 


The question:  Who wrote the New Testament, Jesus or Paul? 

                                   *  *  * *  

I plunged fearlessly in with every intention of making my case for Jesus. I ended up with Paul. Why? In short, my personality is just like Paul’s. Thanks to the patriarchal culture of  his day (mine as well!) it took time. This Jesus was not selling yet another religion, or himself as THE Messiah, but rather a gospel full of parabolic stories about people who broke rules for the sake of justice. It got Jesus crucified of course, but Paul picked up the roots and the wings by which ALL Creation could connect and live peacefully. 

The Great Commandment: Do NOT do to others what you would not have them do to you. God, how boldly simple that is?  To call it LOVE is dramatically misleading. You simply have to treat all living things (land, plants, animals, yourself, all neighbors) with compassion and respect, just as their Creator does.  

                             *  *  *  * 

In the 1970s in the Episcopal Church, I jumped into my own simmering desire to stand behind an altar as a priest of the Eucharist, rather than kneel at a rail, my hands up, my tongue extended, begging to be fed. I know “they” called such a posture humility, but I experienced it as humiliating. 


The Episcopal Church had its own hoops through which an aspirant would jump.The screening committee told me I would be embarking on a “dual vocation.” I could not be a mother AND a priest. I thought of Paul rushing about nagging anyone who would listen, grabbing himself a travel companion, revising his manuscript as he went, and traversing a huge desert called “holy.” I followed. 


It took me well over the expected time it took anyone to get ordained. I did not get tossed into prison like Paul, but if I had I’d have tried to sing hymns, as Paul did. Like Paul, I found friends and allies along my way. Also, I wrote letters to God who from the beginning had listened to my ramblings, dwelled in my heart, and taken me seriously. 

*  *  *  *

My memoir, God Is Not a Boy’s Name. Becoming Woman. Becoming Priest, was published in 2016. Like Paul, I’ve continued to hammer and chisel away at the patriarchal armor through which the expansive love of God continues to shine, no matter what. Like Paul, I trusted divine omnipresence more than divine omnipotence. Paul’s first letter to the squabbling new churches in Corinth felt familiar. “The Spirit searches everything—even the depths of God. . .” (I Cor. 2)


Paul never gave up, broke every law on the books, fiercely and naively insisted that divinity was greater than all our imaginings. He did not found any single church! WE did. 

*  *  *  *

So who did write the New Testament? Paul of course! Jesus didn’t have time to write!


Now I’m 85 years old. I’m still talking and writing without ceasing about that steadfast God Paul trusted. Me too.


 

Sunday, July 2, 2023

2023.07.02 NO! Lyn G. Brakeman, Spiritual Lemons, blog post


A child, about six or seven, once asked me after church, after hearing the grim story in Genesis 22 of Abraham preparing to make a burnt offering of his only beloved son, Isaac.


“Did this really happen?”

“No,” I answered.

“Then why do we read it in church?”

“The biblical readings are meant to teach us something about God.”

“I learned that God was a really bad Dad.”

“Why?”

“Didn’t you listen? God told Abraham to burn up his own son.

“But Abraham didn’t do it, did he?”

“No, but it was close.”

“Why didn’t Abraham do it?” I asked this delightfully inquisitive child. 


I waited and wondered what the child would say next. There was a long, long pause. I stayed quiet. The child was waiting for me to solve this problem for him. I waited. Maybe five minutes passed before the child said anything. He looked up at me before he finally said.


“Because God finally said NO Way?

I nodded.

“Still it took God waaaay too long, right?”

“Yes,” I said.  

*  *  *  *


Back in the late 1980s, it took me a long time to say NO to significant pressure I thought was from God but which really was from the diocesan bishop’s expectation that, after ordination, I would go into full-time parish ministry to help with the shortage of parish clergy. I tried. The parishes I served were authentically appreciative of my ministry with them. I wasn’t bad at the task of managing a small business on volunteer giving the Church calls “stewardship.” I felt as if every sermon secretly functioned like a report card. Whether that was true or not, I knew parish ministry was not for me. I only wanted to be a priest of Word and Sacrament, not a rector. So I said NO. When I left that parish and parish ministry, they presented me with a white stole, hand sewn and delicately embroidered with dates and gratitude for my ministry with them and blessings for my future. 

*  *  *  *

When you go against traditional expectations as Charles Darwin did, you take huge risks. Darwin published his 1859 book On The Origin of Species, saying NO to scientific and religious declarations about his sanity, and NO to the theology of his day that insisted on the omnipotence of God, Creation being the evidence of the same. Darwin went as an unpaid companion on an expedition with Robert Fitzroy, Captain of the HMS Beagle. On the journey to South America, they landed in Rio and stayed till June, 1832. Darwin became ill in sweltering 103-degree temperatures in the tropics but was cured by “cinnamon and port wine.”  This remedy still works I’m told!


On the trip he sampled all kinds of animals, even iguanas, armadillos and agouti rodents, proving that his species could survive and evolve, alongside all kinds of others evolving by natural selection. Darwin’s theory has been misconstrued to mean the survival of the fittest, but he wrote about naturally evolved ingenuity, the development of new traits, and the willingness of the human species to ask questions, take chances, observe closely, and realize that the ONE God created and blessed ALL of it to co-exist. (I confess to swatting mosquitoes, trapping mice, and squishing some wee crawling bugs. I notice they all seem to increase and multiply anyway.)   


When Darwin came across a parasitic wasp laying eggs inside a live caterpillar, to be eaten alive by the grubs after hatching, the event alone challenged his belief in God. He wrote:  “There seems to me too much misery in the world. I cannot persuade myself that a beneficent and omnipotent God would have designedly created the [parasitic wasp] with the express intention of their feeding within the living bodies of caterpillars.” 


So Darwin said NO to this omnipotent Divinity and YES to the God who chooses Love over Control. Darwin risked prison time when his theory was published. Was it denying God as THE Creator? NO, it advocated the growth of ALL creation. I, centuries later as a 21st century woman, believe that the one God delights in the evolving of all Life including its risks and uncertainties.  


Apparently, so did the Buddha. Hermann Hesse, born in Calw, Germany, in 1877, took a trip in 1911 to India and started studying Eastern religions, and ancient Hindu and Chinese cultures. His travels inspired his novel Siddhartha, about the early life of Gautama Buddha. It became popular among the counterculture movement of the 1960s, more than 40 years after it was published. He wrote: "The world is not imperfect or slowly evolving along a path to perfection. No, it is perfect at every moment, every sin already carries grace in it.”  I said YES.


As a parent I learned this lesson early. If I prevented every fall a toddler took while she or he was learning to walk, he or she would never have learned to walk or how to fall and then get up. I also learned how hard it is to love and let go, hard to say NO. I made many mistakes trying to balance the two. I often erred on the side of permissiveness. In time, I said NO to over-mothering, did plenty of under-mothering and exercised my own God-given freedom to evolve.

*  *  *  *

P.S. No God in His Almighty right mind OR heart, would ever authorize the kind of stupid parenting Abraham tried to exercise by sacrificing Isaac. 


God said NO! 


 

Sunday, April 30, 2023

2023.04.30 Know Any Sheep? Lyn G. Brakeman, Spiritual Lemons, blog post

When we traveled in the northern isles into Scotland and Wales, we saw sheep—lots of sheep. They stood around grazing and munching on the green hillside. We used to joke that the sheep were grazing and munching on the green hillsides at night when it got dark and we turned in for the night. In the morning when the sun loomed skyward enough that we could see in the morning light, the first sight we saw were those same sheep still grazing on those same green slopes chewing their cud in the side-to-side way such ruminating ungulates do. 


I always looked for shepherds and I never saw any on those hillsides. It led me to believe that sheep really didn’t need shepherds as much as we think, and possibly in the ways we assumed. In fact the locals would spat about the cantankerous, bellicose personalities of the Irish sheep, as opposed to the placid peaceful Scottish sheep. All of this was good humor, possibly to cover up for underlying hostilities between neighbors—the politics. 

*  *  *  *  

And then in Christian churches I heard a lot about Jesus as a—no THE—Good Shepherd, guiding, prodding, cajoling and scolding all the dumb sheep to make sure they followed him, and him alone. At this idea I bleated and balked, and refused to follow. 


Then I heard a sermon about the parable of the sheep and the goats presenting an image of Jesus, acting on God’s behalf, sitting on a throne separating sheep from goats. He cast aside the goats, designating them to perish in Hell, and adopted the sheep, designating them for salvation as God’s chosen ones. The Gospel was read. The people in the congregation settled into their pews—some ready to listen, other ready to critique, others settling in for a doze, imagining that no one could notice their drifting off. (A preacher in a pulpit or preaching from the crossing, can see all the dozers, believe me—just as we could see all the nonchalant sheep grazing inattentively day and night.)


This particular sermon began: “Some people think this Good Shepherd image for God is bogus.” 


Everyone quickly woke up from dozing or grazing and paid attention. This preacher went on to debunk the “bogus” image of God as Judge. This preacher I fell in love with. I knew he knew how to love everyone equally—goats and sheep—impartially, inclusively, gracefully. This God I loved as well, good goat that I was.   


Apparently, so did some members of a search committee, getting a preview of a priest who might be a candidate for their own parish. They were buried, anonymously, in that morning’s congregation. They too wanted a God who embraced both sheep and goats without prejudice. They elected him as their next rector. In time, I followed.  

Saturday, May 14, 2022

2022.05.15 Easter Five. Risen Indeed? A Risen Rant. Lyn G. Brakeman, Spiritual Lemons, blog post, 5/15/22

The great proclamation on Easter Day Sunday, and through the Easter season of 50 days is: Christ Is Risen. Clergy shout it out. People in congregations shout back: Christ is Risen Indeed. It's like a password—our Christian 'open sesame'.   

I never thought of this before, but the phrase is in the present tense and the passive voice. It doesn’t say Christ rose or arose. Or Christ has risen. It says Christ IS Risen. So who did the rising? Was Jesus connected enough to raise himself up, or does he leave the rising to his identity as the Christ, the Anointed One? And to where? Well, heaven, we presume, or to the place where the God Jesus called Abba is.


Who can figure this stuff out? Not me. No wonder my mother became exasperated with all my questions and wondering. 

*  *  *  * 


The gospel of John remembers Jesus being accused of blasphemy, because he called himself God. His closest followers are smart enough to question all this rising/risen/raised up doughy theological language. Was Jesus daring to say that he IS God? Accusers threatened to stone him. Jesus told them to look at the works he was accomplishing in the name of this God. “. . .if I am doing God’s work, there is no need to believe me; but if I am doing God’s work—even if you don’t believe me (and they don’t)—at least believe the works I do. Then you will know for certain that Abba God is in me and I am in Abba God.”  (14:11-12 ff) 


Hearing these words, they again tried to arrest him but he eluded their grasp. God knows how, of course. Still is it not blasphemous to say he IS God? But he says he is IN God. That is different. 


Recall that John’s gospel was written later than the Synoptics and has a theological agenda to promote, rather than a story to tell. John’s is a gospel of remembrance, close remembrance, but based on eye witness material, gathered from the oral tradition of reciting events and teachings of Jesus. By now, Johannine writers must persuade the listeners that the story they’ve heard has profound, and yes, “risen” meaning. It was a very hard sell, and sometimes John’s gospel sounds like the gospel of the losers, going out on a limb to persuade others that Jesus was the Christ. 


God is in me and I am in God.


How ironic that the same biblical words that persuaded Jesus’s accusers that he was certifiably phony and blasphemous are the very same words that first assured, and still assure, me years later that Jesus is my guru/Master. These words secure my own Christian faith: “God is in me and I in God.”  I am completely convinced by these words. Why?


First, because this is my own experience of God Immanent—closely, deeply present within me.


And second, because, historically and still, these are precisely the words that persuaded the institutional worshipping Churches that it is very important to keep this image of Divine Immanence out of the liturgy, away from the God who dominates our liturgical worship, the One we regularly worship and consistently clothe in patriarchal language. We may not pray these words privately, but we continue to publicly worship a God who is consistently imaged as distantly transcendent, dominantly almighty. Check the Collects, prayers almost all directed to Almighty God and exclusively masculine. Even Christ is masculinized. Jesus was a man, but the Christ IS risen above any gender identity.


Such images of divinity simply do not affirm the God within me. Nor do they affirm the God within whose love we all move and have being. Yes, I can change the words in my personal prayer, but that is not enough. Without conscious awareness, we Christians are reinforcing, through our regular communal, liturgical prayers, a patriarchal image of God. This is the God we worship, the God we hear about most frequently, the God to whom we pray. To me this sexist imagery is idolatrous. 

          *  *  *  *


I can focus on my mostly good works, as Jesus said, and know that God is manifest therein. But I cannot say ‘God is in me and I am in God’ when this God is imaged in this alienating way.


OK, my ire has never been enough to cause me to leave the Church, to bag Christianity, to devalue the historical Jesus, to stop seeking wisdom from the Bible, or renounce my holy orders. But it is enough to cause me pain. And enough for me to liberate God’s image in my personal prayers as well as to seek and create inclusive translations of Scripture. I am not alone. 

*  *  *  *


Way back in 1975, just when I was drawn to follow my own stirred heart, this summary statement from the introduction to Liturgy for All People was written as part of the attempt of some post-Vatican II Roman Catholic clergy to examine theological language:  


“Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me” says the old proverb. We know now that this is a lie. Words can wound, alienate and degrade people.  Language can also affirm and express love. Care for language is a show of concern for people and a revelation of the attitudes of the speaker.    .  .  .  Church language is predominantly masculine. Male terms, images, and stereotypes, so-called sexist language, dominate church expression. Such usage is no longer adequate. It is time to build gender equality into the very fabric of church life. The effort to build new gender-balanced ways of speaking helps us toward gender equality for women and men.”    (from the Preface to The Inclusive Bible, First Egalitarian Translation, published in 2007 by Priests for Equality)


This is the translation I use now. It is not perfect, yet it is written with integrity and faithfulness to the earliest biblical texts. I’m grateful to these Roman Catholic scholars, clergy and lay, for their effort. And of course we are not done yet, and will never be done, trying to follow the Holy Spirit whose wisdom and lithe movement almost always leave us lagging.


Let’s remember how many times the Holy Bible itself has been translated, each time imperfectly. Chasing God is always playing catch-up. Nevertheless………..


God is in you and you are in God. 

Saturday, August 28, 2021

2021.08.29 My "Racism"—Part Twenty-One, Saint/Sinners

Mark’s gospel reminds us that any and all gifts—sacramental liturgies, music, scriptures, even personal gifts within our own flesh, we receive from God. The paradox is this: gifts we praise the most we must give away in order to retain their deepest value. We can experience God’s gifts yet we cannot own, control, or possess them. 

I can’t help but notice, as I think about my own racism, that many women I’ve followed and admired are women of color or lesbians—or at least women who barked at the edges of tradition and made their way from the “outback” of religious tradition into the center where they continue to ruffle the feathers of patriarchy in the church. They are gifted prophets, prophets of transformation, my chosen prophets, ancient and modern, few of them white, all of them healers of my natural, learned, and inherited racism, all of them saints and sinners.   

  *  *  *  *  


Who is not a saint and a sinner?  Ask anyone to tell the truth about both, and you’ll get some kind of definitional sleight of mind, or else denial, usually of the saint category, or, as a last resort, a humble nod and shrug, feigning modest sainthood. No haloes appear. Could it be that sin makes a better God-story? 


Scene LVIII.  Mary Virgin, Mother of the Church, Theotokos


One of the most famous and ill-reputed female heroes of the biblical and church tradition is Mary, the mother of Jesus. She has many names, most of them honorific. Mary was a real woman, a woman who “miraculously” found herself with child, aka pregnant, while she was “betrothed”— engaged, not yet wed. She didn’t lie about it, but listened to God’s voice guiding, not condemning, her from within. Nevertheless, the Church, in its embarrassment at scriptural transparency, elevated her to a place of great esteem, made her a virgin blessed forever, and virtually eliminated any masculine role for both conception AND parenting—unless you want to put faith in God as both sperm donor AND Heavenly Father forever.  


See how patriarchal religious politics accomplished and set in cement the following sins: 

-impugned the female body as a conception machine

-settled on Mary Magdalene as the scapegoat, creating The Magdalene Syndrome, the ugly, unjust brush with which many women are tarred—some innocent and some errant and unforgiven. (see Spiritual Lemons blog post, 8/1/21) 

-enslaved sexual activity within marriage

-put celibacy on a moral high holy ground

-made marriage a sacrament, not of blessing but of control 

-outlawed divorce, birth control and abortion, further imprisoning women

-contributed to poverty, overpopulation, despair, and crime

-made sure Divinity was advertised as transcendent, almighty, and masculine

-locked the image of God into parenting titles 


Women today, and historically, including my own grandmothers, have empowered themselves to change patriarchy in church and state by asserting their gifts, offering their bodies and their voices. They continue to be silenced and abused for their efforts, but they do not stop. I long for the day when the church will let Mary step off her pedestal, relinquish her virginal holiness, and preach her Magnificat to churches and seminaries.  

Scene LIX. My Grandmothers


Eleanor Sampson Gillespie, my paternal grandmother whom I called Grahmmy, gave up her aspirations to be an opera singer in order to get married and have children. She boasted long and often about being one of the first women in her family to graduate from college, in this case Vassar, class of “aughty-aught” (that’s 1900). She fulfilled her “assigned” vocation well with six children, four sons and two daughters, all of whom called her Ma. My dad, Scottishly named McDonald, was #5, sandwiched between two sisters, not always comfortably. Ma was an imposing presence, pigeon-chested like any proper diva would be. She had a beautiful singing voice, and most evenings after dinner she would assemble her “boys” gathering them around the piano to sing. She sang along with gusto. A family “opera.” 


Marguerite Gordon Hall Adams, my maternal grandmother whom I called Ga, and occasionally Goggie or Gagarrhea, if I was angry, defied her family and eloped with her beloved when she was eighteen. Ga grew us in Medford Massachusetts, born into a well-to-do family and living in a large house, let’s say small mansion. She met and fell in love with a man by the name of Avon Franklin Adams, an impresario who imported musical talent from Europe to this country, specifically to New York City, quite bereft in the 1920s of classical musicians. He brought violinist Jascha Heifitz and Alma Gluck, soprano and concert singer, to name just two—both Jewish.  


A.F. Adams’s Jewish identity horrified the Hall family. So the young couple eloped! They were married in Manhattan at the non-denominational Church of the Strangers, established in 1868 by the Rev. Charles Alexander Force Deems. He was a Methodist elder who moved to New York City from North Carolina to pastor the Church of the Strangers on January 1, ’91 (that’s 1891).  


I can’t tell you how fascinating my research was to establish my grandfather’s Jewishness, and therefore my own. He died when my mother was just twelve. She was the youngest child of four, born in1912 when Ga was forty-five, and her father’s favorite. It was apparently mutual, yet she kept the secret of his Jewishness for reasons of her own at which I could only guess. I wish I could have met him. I remain proud of my heritage. 


Scene LX My First Patient in Alcohol/Drug Rehabilitation. 


My experience in parish ministry was, frankly, exhausting. I had trained in and worked in chaplaincy ministry in two general hospitals and one drug/alcohol rehabilitation hospital  in Connecticut. To be a chaplain is a gift I give wherever I am. 


Chaplaincy is a more expansive ministry than parish ministry. A chaplain does not have to comply with, rely on, or “sell”, any one set of religious principles. There are many people who are hospitalized and in need of someone to listen to all their fears, pains, and the deep needs of their souls. They may want to talk to a pastor of their religious preference, and yet many simply long for a listening and compassionate ear, perhaps a prayer or a blessing if this is what they wish. Chaplains by intention transcend religious boundaries. They may have their personal commitments, but they do not wear these on their sleeves. This was especially important with the addiction population, some of whom were openly hostile to religion while their recovery program required that they at least remain open to the idea of a power greater than themselves to support them in their quest for sobriety. 


The first patient assigned to my counsel and care at the treatment center was a young black woman I will call Rochelle. I went to meet her in the detoxification unit and she screamed at me: “Get the hell outta here, you fucking white religious freak!” I was terrified and split. My supervisor was sympathetic but would not change the patient assignment. I would be Rochelle’s counselor for four weeks. Four!  I needed a higher power more than Rochelle! 


I wondered if there was a trigger, other than the pangs of detoxification, for Rochellles’ hostile outburst. As I wondered I fingered the small gold cross I wore around my neck. Bingo! She had probably reacted to the Jesus image. It was a gift to me from my second husband and I still treasure it because it has no corpus on the tiny cross but simply an empty space. That said a lot to me about God’s desire to free us from suffering and pain, not to impose it. We did enough of that all by ourselves. I resolved never again to wear that cross while I worked at this treatment center. My resolve failed. 


I’m not sure exactly how this happened, but I remember wallowing in the Serenity Prayer, the prayer recovering people often use at their meetings. 

God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,

the courage to change the things I can,

and the wisdom to know the difference. AMEN


While I focused on the serenity to accept what I couldn’t change, that is, Rochelle’s animosity toward me, I could stop wearing my cross. I could make myself look completely neutral and safe. I could. But I didn’t. 


When Rochelle was discharged from the detox unit and released into the ongoing program of education and counseling support to help her sustain sobriety, she came to my office. I had my cross on. God, grant me the serenity just to shut up about our first meeting. I did. Rochelle poured out her story to me and I listened with compassion. Whew! I had gotten away with the cross. But just as Rochelle was getting ready to leave the session, she pointed to my cross;. “Oh, that is such a beautiful little cross, so small and is it empty?”  “Would you like to see it close up,” I offered. She did. I removed the cross and handed it to her. She held it and fingered it briefly. I resisted a tiny temptation to give it to her, thank God. She returned it to me with a big grin and a thanks. I did not resist the temptation to consider myself a hot shot chaplain, but I did remember to fondle my small cross and thank Jesus for his corpuscular “absence” from it.