Scene LIV. Divine Identity
Rudolph Otto defined the power of the Holy as mysterium tremendum et fascinans a perfectly contradictory wonderment—and true. You can be afraid of something or someone, repelled, and at the same time fascinated and attracted. I used to feel that way about Ether, the large black woman who worked for my mother and lived with my parents for a time. She was strong, always kind and loving, yet a mysterious and separate presence—holy.
Is God black? I wasn’t sure, but I saw that God was obviously not white or male, because I was female, and Jesus was semitic. I went on to explore the Holy in many guises: Jewish? Christian? Episcopalian? Gay? Womb? Tomb? Male? Female? Father? Mother? Transcendent? Immanent? Almighty? Angry? Judge? Lover? Sexual? Asexual? Socialist? Capitalist? Communist?
My writing was honest, vulnerable, and honestly all mixed up about the ways God could be experienced, dare I say incarnated, and still be God. Whatever the Holy was it was driving me nuts. I had written in my journal for a course in experiential theology about being sexually molested at age eight in a theater by an old man who looked like every image I’d ever seen of God. I wrote: “Terror is breathless. I am paralyzed. Then I feel a hot dimly pleasurable sensation as his finger probes. Why don’t I move? I can’t. I am trapped in a net, caught between the repulsion of molestation and the attraction of clitoral sensation. …I never tell. I think something is wrong with me. It’s my fault.” Tremendum et fascinans?
But what of God and sex? Is sex Holy? I wrote: “A sexual relationship is of God and flies free like the Gospel. Or it is sexual behavior out of duty, mechanical, rigid, conforming, conscripting. One message says: you are beautiful, and sexually responsive, and a woman. The other says: you are a dutiful and sexually performing wife. Ghosting these two is: you are a sexless mother.”
I would say that, for me, there was nothing more holy than birthing and rearing a child. The exertion of birthing felt like God creating in the flesh. Holy. Nursing a child from the milk of my own breasts was also holy—exhausting and miraculous at once. Mothering is also holy, like balancing on a tightrope—how much to let go, how much to let be, have a net of support for falls and failures, and how much and when to intervene—for their own good you always claim. What is fascinating is how maternal love never abates, never leaves, and always keeps growing. What is tremendously mysterious is how much forgiving goes on—self-forgiving, forgiving between mother and child, and the gift of divine forgivingness for countless blunders, yours and theirs. Holy.
My search for God-in-me continued and burst the bounds of everything I thought was Holy—or was taught should be Holy. It was breakdown and breakout time when all kinds of immoral behavior felt holy to me—affairs, masturbation, divorce, sin— all of it viable in my search for sacred power. My New Testament professor commented in my journal’s margins that my search reminded him of D.H Lawrence in Lady Chatterly’s Lover wherein “sexual energy so long blocked and finally released was seen as sacred power.” Holy.
Scene LV. Anger
After the Episcopal Church turned me down in the ordination process, I felt the pain of shame and, strangely, the liberating energy of fury. Tremendum et fascinans.
Most of what I’d learned about anger was that it was “bad”, made trouble, and was unbecoming for women—as in hell hath no fury like it. Anger is damn hard to express without hurting or being hurt, and doubly damned hard to feel without a target to blame, self or other. Nothing calming about it. But boy, does it release piled up energy, like a bull confined in a rodeo stall just before the door swings open. Free. Holy?
I began to empathize with the rage of others who felt trapped in patriarchal biases, unjust abuses, and those excluded from resources made unavailable to them by official policy and deliberate prejudice. Poverty is a death-dealing social disease, and worse, it is racialized and genderized.
I took courses at the UConn School of Social Work, mostly because they offered a joint degree program with Yale Divinity School, and I thought the Church might never ordain me. I encountered the philosophy of Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937). He was a Marxist philosopher who developed a theory of cultural hegemony whereby the ruling class (moneyed) used established cultural institutions to reinforce norms and values that maintained their hegemony, and therefore capitalism. Tremendum. BUT, Gramsci, a neo-Marxist, critiqued materialism and advocated a humanistic understanding of Marxism. He even helped to organize the working classes. Fascinans. (His looks alone are tremendum et fascinans, no?)
What I took from this class was the idea that Gramsci was in favor of a capitalist economy and a socialist society. This idea fueled my ongoing arguments with my Republican father, and would influence my choice to change my political affiliation from Republican to Democrat. I didn’t like Communism or Socialism much, but thought socialist values had a better chance at empowering true Democracy and protecting the right of every citizen of age to vote. My change of party was also deeply influenced by my religious values. I thought Jesus would certainly be a socialist. Surely he despised wealth-ism, and was clearly against any kind of social or economic injustice, inequity—any and all -isms. He, and the God he proclaimed, were obviously not in favor of taxing the poor while the rich, by all means of unholy practices, got richer. But, he did not live in poverty, for if he had he would never have had the energy to travel the land, teach, preach, heal, weep, and pray.
I told myself: keep praying like crazy, continue chaplaincy work, love my children honestly and imperfectly, get a therapist, get a spiritual director, read radical stuff, and get political. The Episcopal Church votes, and will soon elect a new bishop in Connecticut. He might look with favor on this well-fueled aspirant.
He did. I was ordained deacon in 1987 and priest in 1988. Again, tremendum et fascinans—both.
And so…………My personal anger, my political choices, my sexual experiences, my religion, and my spirituality sealed me as firmly anti-racist—and yet. Did I need any more training?









